The government of India is putting a tighter grip on the digital economy once again. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has proposed changes to the IT Rules which broaden their jurisdiction from just traditional news publishers to all users who share information, including everyday users, influencers, content creators on YouTube, and podcasters.
What this means for you is that, if you post about news or current events in any way, you will now be subject to a governing body that used to only regulate traditional media.
Who Will Be Affected?
Previously, registered digital news publishers were the only entities that were subject to IT regulations. The revised regulations will now cover:
- Social Media Influencers
- Independent Journalists
- Podcasters
- Ordinary users posting political or news items
Facebook, YouTube, and X (formerly known as Twitter) will be required to enforce these regulations if they wish to retain their “safe harbour” status, which affords them protection from liability for user-generated content.
What Is ‘Safe Harbour’ and Why It Matters
Safe Harbour provides an opportunity for internet platforms to function without liability for every piece of content posted by a user(s).
Under the new policy:
- Quick compliance with takedown requests from the government
- Threat of losing legal protections if the request is not met
Creates enormous incentive for platforms to take action, regardless of whether the order is actually legal or fair.
Why Critics Are Raising Alarm
Digital rights advocates and creators are very worried about the potential ramifications associated with these proposed amendments. Critics argue that the law will:
Allow for more government involvement in regulating speech on the Internet;
Facilitate media censorship on a mass scale;
Cause creators to censor themselves.
Akash Banerjee, an extremely well-known political satirist, stated that such legislation may create an atmosphere of fear in which creators might be hesitant to voice their opinion, even via satirical forms of expression.
Recent Incidents Fuelling the Debate
The timing of these proposed regulations is very important.
Alluded to above is the fact that recently Platform X (an internet telecommunications provider) has blocked a number of accounts in India at the direction of the Indian government under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act.
Some of these accounts are:
- Satirical Account
- Government critics
- Independent voices
One account holder affected by this blocking, Kumar Nayan, has stated that he was not given any notice before his account was blocked and did not receive any explanation for the blocking; however, the orders have been overturned by a court and his account has been restored; many of the posts he made from that account, however, had been blocked.
The above-discussed circumstances raise questions related to:
- Transparency
- Due Process
- Freedom of expression
The Government’s Stand
According to the government, these new rules are essential for controlling misinformation and regulating the role of ordinary users as influencers of public opinion in the digital age. The government argues that there is a need for a unified approach to regulating misinformation, and the objective of the regulation is to prevent fake news, hate speech, and deepfake content from being distributed via the internet.
The Bigger Concern: Freedom vs Regulation
In the midst of the controversy is this essential question: how do we decide where to set the limit between control and suppression? There are experts claiming that India already has a plethora of different laws that regulate what can and cannot be posted online; however, the wrongful posting and damage caused by those who post hateful or distasteful information on the Internet is now proliferating as a result of these regulations being put in place, as have voices critical of the increasingly monopolised forms of communication being provided through the Internet. Nikhil Pahwa, who is a digital rights advocate, calls this process of regulation an “infrastructure for mass censorship”, particularly now that authorities are reducing their compliance time from 36 hours to 3 hours.
Also Read Ahmedabad Air India Plane Crash
