The Strait of Hormuz has experienced weeks of unrest and upheaval before its reopening due to an agreement for a ceasefire between the US and Iran for two weeks.
This narrow body of water is considered by many to be among the world’s most important shipping lanes; approximately one-fifth of the globe’s crude oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) flow through this route on a continual basis. When this route is closed down and/or significantly slowed down, the world’s supply chain experiences immediate ramifications.
The ceasefire has also created controversy.
It has been reported that Iran plans to impose a toll on ships that transit through the Strait of Hormuz, and this action is in defiance of the long-standing international conventions governing the use of the strait as a shipping lane.
India has communicated its opposition to levying any tolls.
Iran’s Strategic Advantage During the Conflict
Iran’s domination of the Strait of Hormuz served it well as a potent means of exerting influence since hostilities broke out on February 28. By tampering with sea traffic using this route to influence worldwide shipping lanes as well as oil markets, Tehran was able to obtain an advantage in the midst of ongoing hostilities. At the peak of these hostilities, a number of vessels halted their voyages through this region altogether and either turned back or had become stranded in the Arabian Gulf.
A proposal to implement tolls on vessels passing through Hormuz is said to have developed as a part of cease-fire discussions. Both Iran and Oman could charge a toll on ships passing through Hormuz, according to government officials within the region who participated in the talks. Iran has stated that they will use any income generated through these proposed tolls for rebuilding purposes after the end of the conflict. However, this proposal has created concerns among stakeholders in the global shipping column.
India Pushes Back Against the Toll Proposal
According to Indian government sources, India firmly opposes tolls for commercial vessels transiting through the Hormuz Strait. For a nation that imports much of its energy from the Middle East, any added tariff will result in cost increases both in terms of fuel cost and shipping expenses.
An Indian government spokesperson stated that India has not had any discussions with Iran concerning tolls and believes that the proposal contradicts international maritime law. In addition to these concerns, India’s position indicates that if tolls were successfully imposed on Hormuz Strait commercial shipping, then it could serve as a precedent for other chokepoints across the world, such as the Suez Canal or Panama Canal.
What International Maritime Law Says
A famous international treaty that is often debated and discussed is the United Nations treaty on ocean management, called the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The treaty identifies various waters as international straits, which means that vessels of all nations are entitled to proceed through them freely without restriction. The Strait of Hormuz is one of those international straits.
The law dictates that there can be no hindrance to the transit passage of vessels through international straits, which includes requiring payment of tolls or otherwise limiting vessels’ movements. According to experts, this would mean that any attempt by Iran to charge fees to ships would require an amendment to the treaty itself, which would undoubtedly require agreement by a large majority of countries.
Shipping Chaos: Hundreds of Vessels Stuck
Shipping journal reports indicate approximately 800 ships have been stuck in the Gulf region, owing to security fears and uncertainty regarding the integrity of navigation routes. Data from shipping analytics firm Kpler compounded the extent of this disruption; between March 1 and 4, 307 commodity vessels crossed the Strait of Hormuz, down 95% from average peacetime levels.
As shipowners and charter firms prepare vessels that have remained in the Gulf for many weeks to leave, uncertainty with respect to future tolls and military control of the strait continue to increase unpredictability about the situation.
Iran Signals Military Oversight of the Passage
The Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said during a speech as well, “Shipping will continue through the Strait of Hormuz under Iranian military management”, which has caused shipping operators and governments to wonder how transit will be managed moving forward.
Although military control could lead to increased authority over which vessels can transit through the strait, it has raised questions about how shipping could be influenced politically and economically on this important international shipping route.
A Global Flashpoint That Could Shape Energy Markets
The Strait of Hormuz has historically been one of the world’s most politically charged areas.
Disruption in that region could have immediate impacts on the cost of oil and shipping, as well as on energy security.
The fact that India has refused to pay the toll indicates that there is likely to be increased discussion among countries that are major importers of energy from the Middle East.
If Iran proceeds with its plans to introduce a toll, there could be legal disputes, diplomatic tensions, and retaliatory action by countries that are adversely affected.
Currently, the cease fire has provided for the reopening of the strait; however, a fight for control over the strait and whether or not ships will be required to pay a toll to transit through it has only just begun.
Also Read India Breaks 7-Year Freeze: Turns Back to Iran for Oil Amid Middle East Turmoil
